Professor examines son preference in India
Sonia Dalmia grew up in many different regions of India. Dalmia, a
professor of economics at Grand Valley State University, had full
support from her parents to pursue higher education, but that is not
the case for many women in India. Dalmia said boys are preferred over
girls in her native country and she studied data to find the
underlying factors behind the gender bias in child survival rates.
“Son preference is an ancient practice and prevailed even before
sex determination technology, in the form of female neglect — a
passive strategy aimed at allocating a larger share of a family’s
limited financial resources toward better education, health and food
for boys and men from birth,” said Dalmia. “In view of India’s social
and economic diversity and the interplay of cultural and economic
factors, it’s difficult to pinpoint just one reason behind son preference.”
Dalmia examined data collected by the National Council of
Applied Economic Research in India from 1956-1996, which surveyed both
men and women living in north and south India. More than 1,000
households spread over five districts in Uttar Pradesh in northern
India, and 800 households spread over five districts in Karnataka in
southern India, were surveyed by NCAER for a larger study, “Poverty,
Gender Inequality and Reproductive Choice.”
Dalmia said girls are seen as an economic liability and burden,
partly because of the very expensive dowry that must accompany them at
the time of their marriage. She said dowry is not the only cause for
gender bias in child survival rates, noting that sons carry on the
family name and often the business, and usually inherit family
property and perform last rites.
Despite India’s
growing economic prosperity and education levels, Dalmia said the 2011
census figures reveal low sex ratios (849 to 900 girls per 1,000 boys)
in some of the richest states in the nation. Her research shows
positive linkages between son preference and socioeconomic status and
educational attainment. “This contradicts the explanation that sex
selection is an archaic practice common only among the uneducated,”
Dalmia explained.
Some women surveyed indicated they did not want daughters, a
choice motivated by the financial security provided by sons in old
age, the cost of marrying a daughter and a strong desire not to want
their daughters to live the kind of life they lived in India. This
ideology has led to a declining female to male ratio in India that
Dalmia described as alarming. In some areas, the ratio is as low as 80
females per 100 males.
“If the sex ratio at birth remains at 2001 levels, there will be
47 million more men than women in 2050,” said Dalmia. She added that
even if the sex ratio at birth were to remain at the normal level of
106 boys per 100 girls, the female deficit in the age group 20-49
would be at least 25 million in India by 2030.
Dalmia
said the economic and social implications of these ratios will be
far-reaching in the decades to come, especially given India’s
demographic weight and the recent decline in population growth. “This
will not only affect marriage rates but will also result in early
marriage for women,” she said. “The latter will be detrimental to
women’s education, training and employment, decrease women’s labor
force participation rates and, consequently, weaken their political
voice in public decision-making.”
Dalmia said trafficking of and violence against women will
increase, brides will be imported from other regions and the demand
for male labor, especially in the low-skilled and low-wage sectors
largely occupied by women, will rise.
Although wealth and economic development do not reduce son
preference, Dalmia’s analysis found that a woman’s control over her
income more than her labor force participation is the single most
significant factor in reducing the preference for boys.
Subscribe
Sign up and receive the latest Grand Valley headlines delivered to your email inbox each morning.