Significant Events
Take a look at the following significant events, which have shaped the way we conduct human subject research.
Historical Case |
Ethical Concerns |
Result |
---|---|---|
Nuremberg Doctors Trial Nazi physicians and administrators prosecuted by U.S. military tribunal for major war crimes, including medical experiments conducted on prisoners of war. |
Significant violations of personal autonomy, malevolence, unjustifiable harm |
Nuremberg Code Issued by the tribunal during the verdict, established first code of research ethics, 1947 Declaration of Helsinki World Medical Association code of ethics on human experimentation, 1964 |
Thalidomide anti-nausea drug stalled during FDA approval, birth defects mount |
Risk unbalanced by benefit, informed consent, unproven drug safety and efficacy |
Kefauver-Harris Amendments passed to strengthen FDA regulations (est. 1938) governing the drug development process, 1962 |
Beecher article, Ethics and Clinical Research examples of unethical biomedical research culled from recent literature, 1966. |
Disregard for informed consent, unnecessary harm |
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical JournalsIssued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, commonly referred to as the "Vancouver Group" |
Social and behavior research illuminates need for participant protections beyond the scope of biomedical studies: Humphrey's Tearoom Trade, 1970 |
Deception, emotional and psychological harms, violations of privacy and confidentiality |
American Psychological Association develops Research Principles, 1973, emphasizing the researcher's personal responsibility for ethical decision making |
Tuskegee Syphilis Study NY Times article unveiled 40 year U.S. Public Health Service study in which poor, African-American men with syphilis were studied but left untreated, 1972. |
Uninformed consent, injustice, risk to participants and family members |
Led to formation of the National Research Act, 1974 and created initial guidelines for human subjects research in the Code of Federal Regulations Resulted in The Belmont Report, by the Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979 |
Increase in production of legitimate but sophisticated medical devices such as the Dalkon Shield, Intraocular Lenses, and Cardiac Pacemakers drove Congress toward improved device regulations. |
Unproven safety of marketed medical devices |
Cooper Committee recommendations to regulate medical devices culminate in the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 |
Past research experiments exposed, lead to public mistrust: |
Unjustified physical and emotional harms, exploitation of vulnerable populations, absence of informed consent |
President Clinton establishes the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (1994) and the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1995-2001) |
Jesse Gelsinger dies in a gene therapy clinical trial in 1999; unethical research conduct uncovered |
Conflict of interest, insufficient informed consent |
Office for Human Research Protections issues Financial Conflict of Interest guidance, 2001 |
U.S. PHS Syphilis Study in Guatemala (1946-48) exposed |
Absence of consent, injustice, risk to participants and family members, exploitation of vulnerable populations |
President Obama establishes the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in 2009 and requests investigation of Guatemala Syphilis Study, 2010 |