Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the established threshold. Student average ranged from 3.1-3.4 and 74-86% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in 13 sections of ECO 210 offered in Fall 2018. The performance of accounting majors enrolled across the 13 sections was isolated for the purposes of this assessment.

2018 Status
Not Yet Achieved
Mean scores on 3/4 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance met or exceeded the established threshold. Student average ranged from 3.1-3.7 and 70-96% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.

2017 Status
Achieved
Written communication was assessed in ACC 311 in Winter 2017. Average scores ranged from 3.2 to 3.9. Between 88% to 100% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric suggesting that the changes made after the last assessment were effective.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the established threshold by a wide margin. Student average ranged from 3.5-3.8 and 100% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.

2016 Status
Achieved
Average scores ranged from 3.5 to 3.8 in Fall 2016. Between 89% to 100% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
The MFT test by ETS was administered in seven sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Winter 2021. 37 BBA-ACC students took the test along with other business majors. Student performance was above the national average and met the established threshold.

2019 Status
Achieved
The MFT test by ETS was administered in six sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Fall 2018. 41 BBA-ACC students took the test along with other business majors. Student performance was mostly satisfactory.

2016 Status
Achieved
Performance on each question is reported in terms of the percentage of students who answered the question correctly. 48.22% of Seidman business students answered the questions chosen correctly in comparison to 48.04% nationally. Since the scores are reported by item instead of by student the performance of ACC Majors could not be separated from that of non- ACC majors.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
The MFT test by ETS was administered in seven sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Winter 2021. 37 BBA-ACC students took the test along with other business majors. Student performance satisfactory

2019 Status
Achieved
The MFT test by ETS was administered in six sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Fall 2018. 41 BBA-ACC students took the test along with other business majors. Student performance was mostly satisfactory.

2016 Status
Achieved
Total scores for the Major Field Tests are reported on a scale of 120-200. The average score of ACC majors was 157.8, which was higher than the performance of students at our competitive institutions (average=150.9). In terms of specific discipline areas, the ACC majors performed either at par or better than the competitive group in accounting, economics, finance, marketing, legal & social environment, international business and information systems. The student performance was marginally below the competitive group in management and quantitative business analysis.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance met or exceeded the established threshold. Average scores ranged from 3.3 to 3.5 and between 87% to 94% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.

2018 Status
Achieved
Average scores ranged from 3 to 3.2. Between 69% to 88% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Not Yet Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance met the established threshold on criterion 3 but fell short on criterion 4 of the four-point scale rubric. Only 55% of the students performed at level 3 or above on identification of cultural factors (criterion 4).

2018 Status
Achieved
Average scores ranged from 1 to 2.7. Between 0% to 58% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.

Measure 1

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in two sections of ACC 333 in Winter 2019.

2018 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in two sections of ACC 333 in Winter 2017.

Measure 1

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in two sections of ACC 333 in Winter 2019.

2018 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in two sections of ACC 333 in Winter 2017.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the established threshold. Student average ranged from 3.0-3.5 and 72-88% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in four sections of ACC 310 in Fall 2018.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the established threshold. Between 75.4-83.1% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in one section of ACC 413 and one section of ACC 414 in Fall 2018.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the new threshold. 77.8% of the students scored 70% or above on the assessment quiz.

2019 Status
Achieved
This objective was assessed in four sections of ACC 321 in Fall 2018

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
The objective was assessed in three sections of ACC 340 in Winter 2021.

Measure 1

2021 Status
Achieved
The objective was assessed in three sections of ACC 340 in Winter 2021.