2021 Status Achieved In this second round of assessment, student performance met or exceeded the established threshold.
2019 Status Achieved This objective was assessed in 13 sections of ECO 210 offered in Fall 2018. The performance of non accounting business majors enrolled across the 13 sections was isolated for the purposes of this assessment.
2018 Status Not Yet Achieved 68.17% of the students scored at level 3 or above in Fall 2015.
2021 Status Achieved In this second round of assessment, student performance met or exceeded the established threshold. Student average ranged from 3.0-3.8 and 70-96% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.
2018 Status Achieved Mean scores on 5/6 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold
2021 Status Achieved In this second round of assessment, student performance exceeded the established threshold. Student average ranged from 3.2-4.0 and 79-100% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale rubric.
2018 Status Achieved The objective was assessed in MGT 331 in Winter 2018. The mean scores on 4/6 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
2021 Status Achieved The Major Field Test (MFT) by ETS was administered in seven sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Winter 2021. 254 Business Majors took the test. Student performance (154) was above the national average (149.3) and met the established threshold.
2019 Status Achieved This objective was assessed in six sections of MGT 495 in Fall 2018. The performance of 184 non-accounting business majors enrolled in the six sections of MGT 495 was isolated for the purposed of this assessment.
2016 Status Achieved Performance on each question on the test is reported in terms of the percentage of students who answered the question correctly. 48.22% of Seidman business students answered the questions chosen correctly in comparison to 48.04% nationally.
2021 Status Achieved The Major Field Test (MFT) by ETS was administered in seven sections of MGT 495 (Capstone) in Winter 2021. 254 Business Majors took the test.
2016 Status Achieved Scores for the Major Field Tests are reported on a scale of 120-200. The average score of business students was 150.5 which was comparable to the performance of students at our competitive institutions (average=150.9). In terms of specific discipline areas, our students performed either at par or better than the competitive group in accounting, economics, finance, marketing, legal & social environment, international business and information systems. The student performance was marginally below the competitive group in management and quantitative business analysis.
2021 Status Achieved Student performance on criterion 1, 2 and 5 of the four-point scale rubric was satisfactory. An average of 90.3% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.
2018 Status Achieved Average scores ranged from 2.7 to 2.9. Between 61% to 81% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.
2021 Status Achieved Student performance on criterion criterion 3 and 4 of the four-point scale rubric was satisfactory. An average of 72.5% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.
2018 Status Achieved Average scores ranged from 1 to 2.2. Between 0% to 33% of the students sampled performed at level 3 or 4 on a four-point scale rubric.
2021 Status Achieved Criterion four on the rubric is used to measure this objective. Student performance was satisfactory and improved from 67% to 70% of the students performing at level 3 or above on criterion 4 of the four-point scale rubric.
2018 Status Achieved A total of 264 students were assessed across different disciplines and delivery of instruction. The average student performance was 3.11 and 72.73% of the students performed at level 3 or above.
2021 Status Achieved Criterion 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the four-point scale rubric are used to measure this objective. Although, on average 76.5% of the students performed at level 3 or above on the four-point scale overall, their performance on stakeholder identification and Personal Voice and Action was below the threshold.
2018 Status Achieved Recommendations of the GAT were implemented in Winter 2018.
